Bureaucrats, checkuser, oversight, Administrators
61,849
edits
On November 27th, 2022, the 8,000th article was added to the SuccuWiki!
Def by Temptation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Critical Review
m (→External Links) |
|||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
== Critical Review == | == Critical Review == | ||
''The following review is from the Amazon.com link in the External Links below:'' | |||
*4 out of 5 stars | |||
*Decent Movie, Deals with Real Struggles | |||
*Reviewed On: April 9, 2000 | |||
*Reviewed By: dred_steel | |||
As an avid fan of movies from the vampire genre, I wasimmediately drawn to this one based on the detailed review of AndrewWright of Amazon.com. However, to my surprise, the movie is not about vampires, but instead about the eternal struggle that men are confronted with--temptation. Bond portrays a minister "to-be" who comes from a long line of ministers. Struggling with the question as to whether there is more to life than the ministry, he visits his childhood friend, Hardison, who is a struggling "B" movie actor in New York. Little did he know that he would encounter a demon temptress named, you guessed it, Temptation, who, like the reviewer stated, is single-handedly destroying the men from a local "pick-up" joint. | |||
What makes this movie interesting is also what makes it a little campy. The seductress plays on the main sexual deviations of men: each concluding with real, and relevant, endings to the perpetrators. The real storyline poses the question, "Can you resist Temptation in this life to do what God requires of you?" This is a question which is posed bluntly, and those who answer no, meet gruesome ends. | |||
Overall, the storyline is good, the acting decent, and Cynthia Bond as the temptress is hot. This is overall a good movie and well worth viewing. | |||
== External Links == | == External Links == | ||