On November 27th, 2022, the 8,000th article was added to the SuccuWiki!
Talk:Greater Succubus: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:::I agree completely, then I ask another question which is, should this then be removed or changed to reflect the information you have? [[User:TeraS|TeraS]] 02:39, 8 October 2010 (UTC) | :::I agree completely, then I ask another question which is, should this then be removed or changed to reflect the information you have? [[User:TeraS|TeraS]] 02:39, 8 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
::::I would simply change it to say 3.0. It really bugs me that I can't find the original that people seem to be referring to![[User:Loren|Loren Pechtel]] 22:05, 8 October 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:05, 8 October 2010
While this page claims to be 3.5 the damage reduction is in the 3.0 format. I have been unable to locate the monster to figure out what it should be.Loren
- It's entirely possible that I made a mistake on the edition. I do know that it is from the Wizards.com site, I'll have to look into where it was there to be sure... Thank you for pointing this out! TeraS 15:41, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- After another search the only place I can locate it is in the Savage Species book--and that's 3.0, not 3.5Loren
- Then it's 3.0. And I just realized that someone else added the .5 earlier in the history of this page as well? TeraS 23:57, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Argh! I should have known better than to trust a secondary source! I actually looked in Savage Species and find that it talks about greater and lesser succubus *POWERS*--dividing them up as to what level you get them. The closest I've found for it is pages 170-172 of the Book of Erotic Fantasy but this is *NOT* an exact match, your version is substantially more powerful.
I find exactly two copies of your stats on the web, your own page and http://www.enworld.org/forum/general-rpg-discussion/24680-i-need-help-my-abyssal-campaign-meeting-graz-zt-my-players-stay-out.html#post374256
Since that post was made 9 months before 3.5 came out it must be 3.0. I still don't know where it's from, though. She must be a good wizard and has cast non-detection!Loren 02:27, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- I agree completely, then I ask another question which is, should this then be removed or changed to reflect the information you have? TeraS 02:39, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- I would simply change it to say 3.0. It really bugs me that I can't find the original that people seem to be referring to!Loren Pechtel 22:05, 8 October 2010 (UTC)