On November 6th, 2024, the 9,000th article was added to the SuccuWiki!
Incubus The Malevolent Dream Stalkers (eBook): Difference between revisions
(Created page with "Category:Film and Media {{Infobox book <!-- |italic title = (see above) --> | name = Incubus<br>The Malevolent Dream Stalkers | image = 200px|alt=Incubus The Malevolent Dream Stalkers eBook Cover, written by Kennith Harvey | image_caption = Incubus The Malevolent Dream Stalkers<br> eBook Cover, written by Kennith Harvey | author = Kennith Harvey | title_orig = | translator = | illustrator...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
== Book Review == | == Book Review == | ||
'' | ''The following review was originally published by Tera on her Blog, A Succubi's Tale on [https://www.succubus.net/blog/2026/01/09/a-review-of-incubus-the-malevolent-dream-stalkers-by-kennith-harvey/ January 9, 2026]'' | ||
The book’s summary and length suggest something of substance and effort which gives proper consideration to the incubus myths and seeks to find an understanding of it. However, from the first page, the tone and thoughts expressed feel strange and odd. | |||
Though it is not noted on the work itself, at times there is a feeling that a question was asked of AI, it did some research, and returned something of a heartless, emotionless, and monotone answer in reply. There’s no passion in the words, several parts feel very much like they were copied from Wikipedia, or at least the chapter titles seem to express that. | |||
As a result, the information that appears has, for lack of a better phrase, no soul to it. There’s no reflection or expanding on a thought, all there is comes out as a series of points and statements which give information, but not delve into the heart of the matter. | |||
One out of five pitchforks. | |||
The work is just so very disappointing, similar to another I have recently reviewed feeling too much like some Wikipedia article information was copied and then a scattering of other source material thrown in to add some passing. This could have been interesting, but it was very much not so. | |||
== External Links == | == External Links == | ||
*[https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0F51BFVFG/ This work in Kindle Format at Amazon.com] | *[https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0F51BFVFG/ This work in Kindle Format at Amazon.com] | ||
Latest revision as of 16:57, 9 January 2026
| Incubus The Malevolent Dream Stalkers | |
|---|---|
 Incubus The Malevolent Dream Stalkers eBook Cover, written by Kennith Harvey | |
| Author(s) | Kennith Harvey |
| Publisher | Amazon Digital Services |
| Publication date | April 15, 2025 |
| Media type | eBook |
| Length | 84 Pages |
| ASIN | B0F51BFVFG |
For other uses of the word Incubus, see Incubus (disambiguation).
Incubus The Malevolent Dream Stalkers is an eBook written by Kennith Harvey. In this work the mythos of Incubi are examined.
Overview
- Title: Incubus The Malevolent Dream Stalkers
- Author: Kennith Harvey
- Published By: Amazon Digital Services
- Length: 84 Pages
- Format: eBook
- ASIN: B0F51BFVFG
- Publishing Date: April 15, 2025
Plot Summary
Delve into the enigmatic world of incubi, malevolent dream stalkers that have haunted human folklore for centuries. This comprehensive guide explores the origins, myths, and legends surrounding these supernatural entities. Discover their chilling abilities, methods of seduction, and the devastating impact they can have on their victims. Learn about the beliefs, rituals, and amulets used to protect against their advances, and uncover the psychological and scientific explanations behind the incubus experience. With captivating case studies, historical accounts, and contemporary manifestations, this book provides a captivating exploration of a fascinating and enduring phenomenon.
Book Review
The following review was originally published by Tera on her Blog, A Succubi's Tale on January 9, 2026
The book’s summary and length suggest something of substance and effort which gives proper consideration to the incubus myths and seeks to find an understanding of it. However, from the first page, the tone and thoughts expressed feel strange and odd.
Though it is not noted on the work itself, at times there is a feeling that a question was asked of AI, it did some research, and returned something of a heartless, emotionless, and monotone answer in reply. There’s no passion in the words, several parts feel very much like they were copied from Wikipedia, or at least the chapter titles seem to express that.
As a result, the information that appears has, for lack of a better phrase, no soul to it. There’s no reflection or expanding on a thought, all there is comes out as a series of points and statements which give information, but not delve into the heart of the matter.
One out of five pitchforks.
The work is just so very disappointing, similar to another I have recently reviewed feeling too much like some Wikipedia article information was copied and then a scattering of other source material thrown in to add some passing. This could have been interesting, but it was very much not so.